- the washington post has these stories on thar frunt page --
- the new york times has these --
- over at the la times, ye gut these stories as the mane noose of the day --
- finely, heres yer boston globe mane hedlines --
but how kin it be that the washington post dont have nuthin bout the karl rove story? how is it that a speech by bush that dint have nuthin new to say gits to be the top story? them 10 plots is ackshly ole news, kindly lack the subway story that wuz knowd by them offishulls fer 6 days befor they sharrd the informayshun with the folks that rides them subways.
i half to add mitt i caint figger how these folks figgers whuts importunt, but i know this: taint room fer moren three or four stories on the frunt page. that means that ye kin hide a importunt story by puttin it sumwhars else. so dont it seem a lil odd that the washington post woodnt have the rove story -- witch is bout treason, after all, even ifn taint rove thats gilty -- as its mane thang?
mayhap its jes me, a wanderin (and wunderin) hillbilly.
No comments:
Post a Comment