pinions of buddy don: terrsts win a nuther vicktry over us

habeas corpus, 1789-2006 — r.i.p.

tiz a sad day in amurka when 65 senators let tharself git so skeerd by a bunch of criminulls that dont even have a state of thar own till they vote to suspend habeas corpus. tiz my ardent hope that the supreme cort will putt a stop to the madness, witch tiz planely unconstitutional, ifn articull one, seckshun nine has inny meanin:

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

terrism dont have the power to win a military battle. thats the hole point of it. all it kin do is skeer folks a nuff till they agree to limit thar own freedum, till they agree to give up thar way of life n liberties, till they agree to reduce tharself frum bein the eggsample that gave the worl hope to bein down on the same level as the terrsts they fear so much.

our palltishuns is so skeerd that they confuse the accused suspeck with the convickted guilty.

mr hasterts shameful statement that dimcrats efforts to perteck due process n the rule of law coddles terrsts is a low point in amurkin histry — we have now gone frum bleevin suspecks are innocent till proovd guilty to bleevin suspecks are dun alreddy guilty, subjeck to tortcher, indefinite confinement, even death, without bein able to deefend thar innocents, see the evidents agin em, to have a lawyer, even to let thar own fambly know they dun been locked up.

n ifn ye thank it caint happen to yer avridge amurkins, to yew or me or innybidy else mr bush wonts to claim is a terrst suspeck, then ye need to git to wurk readin yer histry. power corrupts n even the best intentchuns caint stop it frum bein abused.

i guess we are jes lucky to have a infallibull presidint that dont never make no miss take, that hadnt never arrested a sangle innocent person.

i am deeply dissapointed that mr bush used fear of terrsts to go agin the constitushun that he swore to uphold n perteck. as articull one of the constitushun putts it:

Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

ye mite could notiss whar it dint say nuthin bout perteckin the amurkin peeple, witch thats the eggscuse mr bush uses fer givin into the basest of human instinks. no, hes spozed to be pertecktin n deefendin the constitushun.

but he aint pertecktin it. hes chippin away at the rites of us citizens the constitushun used to perteck.

to be honest, i dont eggspeck nuthin more outta mr bush n the rubberstamplicans that the once grand ole party has becum. they dun proovd thay aint no place too low fer em to stoop to keep thar power.

but but i am most deeply offended in the dimcrats that voted fer this awfull legislayshun, speshly the two frum the state whar i live, new jersey.

chalk up a nuther victry fer osama n all tuther terrsts who hate the u.s. 'for our freedoms'. as mr bush putt it his ownself back in september of 2001:

Americans are asking, why do they hate us? They hate what we see right here in this chamber -- a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.

this frum the leader of the same bunch that claims inny dissent emboldens the enemy, that wont face no folks assembled in protest, that putts up 'free speech zones'.

my grandies ole outhouse on a muggy august day dint stink this bad.

osama n his ilk attacked us to make us give up our freedums, liberties n way of life. who wooda thunk our own representatives wood be so quik to do his biddin, to remoov the verr consitushunull pertekshuns that used to make us the light n hope of the worl?

(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)