Thursday, September 07, 2006

pinions of buddy don: a few questchuns

i wuz wundern whut wuz ment by the wurd 'fascist' so i looked it up n found out tiz sumbidy that bleeves in the princepills of 'fascism.' so whut is fascism? i looked it up too n found this at dictionary.reference.com:
–noun
1. (sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

2. (sometimes initial capital letter) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.

3. (initial capital letter) a fascist movement, esp. the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922–43.
so heres a cuple questchuns:
  1. how kin a ragtag bunch of criminull terrists be fascists ifn they dont have no gummint, dont have no military industrial complex, dont have the means to suppress opposishun n criticism or regiment all industry (they dont gut no industry!), commerce (whut commerce?), etc. (whut etc have they gut?)
  2. how kin they emphasize thar nashunullism ifn they dont gut no nayshun?
corse, the reason i ast is on accounta of the publicans trine to claim them terrists is islamofascists, witch that brangs up a nuther questchun or two:
  1. how kin they be fascists ifn they dont have no cuntry?
  2. fer that matter, whuts the differnts twixt fascism n the unitary presdint that gits to do whutever he wonts to do ifn he has suspishun that sumbidy mite be suspishus?
nuther thang i wunder bout is that one percent doctrine of dick cheney. the idee is that ifn thays a one percent chants of a attack happnin, ye treat it lack twuz a'gone happen. it kin justify attackin sumbidy on suspishun thays a one percent chants that they mite attack yew sumday. ok, so heres my questchuns, witch the furst questchun is the same one abraham wuz astin god bout sodom n gomorrah, witch as ye mite member, god deecided he woodnt deestroy them evil places ifn thay wuz even one good person amung em, witch turnt out lot wuz that one person:
  1. whut percent of innocent folks kin we kill?
  2. whut percent of em kin be christchuns?
  3. jews?
  4. muslims?
  5. hindus?
  6. non-bleevers?
  7. our own soljers, sailors, airmen n marines?
nuther thang i wunder is bout that agreement pakistan has made not to keep sendin troops to waziristan, witch thats whar we bleeve osama bin laden is hidin:
  1. ifn a cuntry that gives terrsts support n shelter deeserves to be attacked, how cum we dont attack pakistan?
  2. or is that doctrine jes a nuther kewl sound bite?
lastly, we herd mr bush yesterdy finely astin congress to make legal all them not-quite-legal thangs he has dun been a'doin. he sed thay wuznt no time to waste. dont that brang up a questchun or two? fer instunts:
  1. why wuznt it urgent back whenever mr bush wuz furst brakin them laws?
  2. why do them fambly members of them 9/11 victims deeserve closhure now but dint deeserve it ere the eleckshun wuz a cuple munths away?
  3. why is congress bein ast to be a enabler fer a law-braker in sted of a check n balance to the eggzecutive branch lack tiz spozed to be accordin to the constitushun?
i wish i had sum ansers, witch heres the closest thang i gut: mr bush is astin his rubberstamplicans in congress to rubberstamp his lawbrakin on a counta ifn the dimcrats should try to deefend the constitushun, them publicans kin paint em as bein weak on nashunull deefents, witch that leads to my last questchuns:
  1. aint thay nuthin but partisans left in washington?
  2. aint thay no patriots left to stand up fer the constitushun?
  3. has them publicans – them rubberstamplicans – gut no shame?
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)

1 comment:

CM Edwards said...

Great post and great questions, Buddy Don.

I was just reading about this the other day- the Nation or the Progressive. They were saying that while the Germans and Italians of the 30's and 40's did use history in their rhetoric, their systems were modern and industrialized. Wheras the Wahabbis seem want to actually take their people back in time and reject anything modern or industrial. The compatibilty between Islam and fascism isn't there.

I've read the Quran (in English) and alot of what is in there is closer to socialism of a sort than the corporate-friendly ideolgy of fascism.