!(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
The Odyssey
2 days ago
yesterdy my battries wuz ded ere the sun cum up. today i wuz reddy, witch the sun wernt near as purty this morning as yesterdy, but i figgerd twood do ...
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
(click on the pitcher to see it bigger.)




"Respect for the legislative branch is not shown through [making a] veto," Boardman argued. "Respect for the legislative branch, when we have a well-crafted bill, the majority of which is constitutional, is shown when the president chooses to construe a particular statement in keeping with the Constitution, as opposed to defeating an entire bill that would serve the nation."but thats eggzackly the rong point. tiz the congress that makes the laws. the presdint is spozed to uphold em, to eggsecute em, not change em, not interpret em. interpretayshun blongs to the courts, makin laws to the congress.
Boardman said the president has the power and responsibility to bypass any statute that conflicts with the Constitution, even in cases "where the Supreme Court has yet to rule on an issue, but the president has determined that a statutory law violates the Constitution."
Lobster-like we sit in tepid watera nuthern that cum to me wuz thisn:
And do seem not to notice as the heat
Slowly rises, threatening to slaughter
Each of us before we can retreat.
Too smart to think, like the Democrats do,ben franklin tole us the foundin fathers had dun give us a republick, ifn we could keep it.
We always agree with each other –
We have no plan but to jeer and to boo
As we rubberstamp for big brother.
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
honeybee in geranium ...(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
papyrus ...
palm leaf ...
flowering onion ...
sea holly ...
mamas splainin how shes gut to take a lil swim ...(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
off she goes ...
mayhap she wonts to tell daddy tiz time fer im to watch them ducklins, witch here he is ...
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below)






but them lilies keeps on a'bloomin, perched on the surfuss of the veil betwixt two worls:
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)
(ifn ye wonta make a comment, click on 'link' below.)
Given that Zarqawi has become a loose cannon and that his actions are handicapping Al Qaeda's efforts, it seems reasonable to expect that an accident may befall him at some point in the near future. If handled right it can be made to look like he went out in a blaze of glory fighting American troops or that he was foully murdered. Either way, al Qaeda gets rid of a problem and gains another "martyr."whuts intrestin bout thisn is how twuz published yesterdy, BEFORE zarqawi wuz killt.
It's Always Seemed to Me a Little Oddwhenever i reprinted this the furst time, i figgerd by now twooda gone outta date. after readin this mornins papers, i am sorry to see how tiz as current as ever:
It's always seemed to me a little odd
That in his time on earth as Jesus, God
Would fail to make a parable or mention
That being gay defies nature's convention!
Or why in all the truths He did convey
No word against abortion did He say?
Why didn't He explain where life begins
Instead of pardoning evil-doers' sins?
Or how could He ignore the bankers' need
To charge percents of interest that exceed
The fed's prime rate by multiples of eight
And help our rich folks' wealth accumulate?
Instead He advised all to be so meek
That, if attacked, we turn the other cheek
Did He not know the interests of our nation
Might require preëmptive invasion?
pinions of buddy don: ye caint win harts n minds with bullets
i wish i could find the quotayshun whar sumbidy wuz arguin that ye kin establish democracy with a gun. i thank twuz in the washington post, but i cant find it nohow. the riter pointed out how thay had dun been a few democracies made thataway. a cuple he menchuned wuz the american revolution n the french revolution.
but thatn dont wurk fer whuts a'goin on in iraq, witch thats whut the riter wuz trine to say, that ye could make a democracy usin a gun. problem with his eggzamples is that the holders of the guns wuz the folks who wuz fitin fer thar own democracy. twuz the insurgents in the fite, not the big powers, be they the british or the french monarchy. tiz us in iraq.
the history of the worl shows ye that it takes a folk makin thar own cuntry to git ye a democracy out of it. n that means that the folks has to git it into thar own harts n minds that democracy is whut they wont. ifn they dont wont it, then ye cant enforce it on a counta ye wood be voted out furst time they tuck a vote.
so whuther we lack it or not, whut we half to do ifn we wont democracy overn iraq (or innywhar) is to cunvints folks to wont it fer thar ownself. ye gut to win thar harts n minds. taint easy.
take whut's a'goin on over in iraq right now. furst, we had to close one of thar media outlets, al arabiya, on a counta how twuz broadcastin saddam hussein. in its place we dun put up a stayshun or our own name of al iraqiya. thang is, folks in iraq druther here al arabiya than al iraqiya.
problem fer us is were in a fite we dont hardly know how to win. these is just my pinions, so ye kin ignore em all:corse, ifn we cant win the harts n minds over here, whut kin we speck frum our efforts over thar? we wuz set on gittin osama, dead or alive. whutever becum of him? we wuz a'gone smoke him out frum whutever hole he wuz in. he wuz publick enemy number 1 with a bullet. now hes a forgotten man livin in pakistan or afghanistan, sumwhars whar we aint gut a nuff troops to ketch him.
- folks livin in iraq aint used to democracy n dont hardly wont it
- ifn ye could give democracy out to folks in iraq, its hard to bleeve they wood vote the way we wont em to
- folks livin in the arab worl larnt how to fite asymetrickull battles frum lawrence of arabia n they been a'usin it ever since (have ye dun red t. e. lawrences seven pillars of wisdom? do ye wonta unnerstand whut's a'gone on over thar? then ye gut to read it! the movie aint near as good as the book fer this kinda thang)
- folks livin the arab worl have been wontin n havin theocracy in sted of democracy most of thar histries.
- thays folks over here that seems to wonta make us a theocracy in sted of a democracy
- ifn folks over here, whar we gut us a form of republican democracy, kin wonta a theocracy, it shouldnt cum as a sprize that folks wonta keep the theocracies they dun gut or could git back
- granted, iraq wuz a secular muslim nayshun, n thats whut we wont it to be, but thays minny folk over thar that never wonted it to be secular
- member that the main thang saddam n osama couldnt agree on whuz whuther to have theocracy or a secular gummint
- mos everthang we kin do with our power is a'gone hep tuther side make its points agin us
did sumbidy use weppons of mass distrackshun on us?
i luv my cuntry the way i luv my son. ifn he wuz to tell me he wuz gittin reddy to do sumthin stoopid, lack try smokin crack, i wood criticize him. i wood try to stop him. i wood have a march on his home if i thought it wood wurk. fack is, i wood do everthang i could to git him to stop. i wood not be anti-son fer doin so. ifn he persisted in takin the rong path, i couldnt pertend its rite jes to show him my support. i wood half to tell him the truth.
same applies to my cuntry. twuz a miss take to git distrackted frum gittin osama. period. ifn we dont stick with doin whut we say were a'gone do, then aint nobidy gonna take us serious.
n ifn ye aint tuck serious, ye dont win harts n minds. fack is, ye kin only win harts with luv n minds with better idees. bullets dont fit neethur deescriptshun.

The debate over ratification elicited a flood of pamphlets on both sides. Washington read them all. He became convinced that the arguments of the opponents, based mostly on regionalism and an identification of strong government with tyranny, were hysterical when they were not self-serving. The pamphlets supporting the Constitution, particularly The Federalist written by Hamilton, Madison, and John Jay, persuaded Washington that "the Constitution is really in its formation a government of the people; that is to say, a government in which all power is derived from, and, at stated periods, reverts to them; and that, in its operation it is purely a government of laws, made and executed by the fair substitutes of the people alone. . . . It is clear to my conception that no government before introduced among mankind ever contained so many checks and such efficacious restraints to prevent it from degenerating into any species of oppression."as i red this, i wuz also reeminded of sumthin Ben Franklin wuz spozed to have sed at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787:
QUOTATION: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”to putt it altogether, heres the final pargraff frum a articull name of A Republic, If You Can Keep It by Richard R. Beeman, Ph.D.:
“A Republic, if you can keep it.”
If there is a lesson in all of this it is that our Constitution is neither a self-actuating nor a self-correcting document. It requires the constant attention and devotion of all citizens. There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created. His answer was: "A republic, if you can keep it." The brevity of that response should not cause us to under-value its essential meaning: democratic republics are not merely founded upon the consent of the people, they are also absolutely dependent upon the active and informed involvement of the people for their continued good health.ye gut to keep in mind how them early amurkins lack franklin n washington wuz librulls n proud of it. the cunservatives wuz them that figgerd the colonies orta remain loyal to the crown of england.

