Thursday, September 04, 2008

pinions of buddy don: how cum bleevers caint have faith in whut they claim to bleeve?

thays a pluralty of christchuns in this cuntry that dont seem to thank god is up to the task of doin the judgin jesus eggsplained wuz hisn, not ourn, to do, witch he taught that in the sermon on the mount in the seventh chaptur of matthew:
1Judge not, that ye be not judged.

2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

3And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

4Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

5Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
ifn ye truly bleeve in whut jesus sed in that famus sermon, then ye dont need to git yer gummint to ban aborshun, speshly in a demockrussy whar most folks ackshly supports the rite of a woman to make her own choices bout whuther to have a baby n risk eternull damnayshun by treatin her lil zygote lack the millyuns of other lil zygotes kept on ice after inveetro fertilizayshun: gittin rid of it.

i aint sayin thats rite, only that tiz up to god to judge, not me ... n not my gummint. (thanks to them publicans n them spineless dimcrats, thar way too far up in our bedrooms n phones n emails alreddy!)

it also aint the role of our gummint to enforce laws on the basis of relijun. taint to say gummint should let jes anythang go -- ye caint sankshun murder or robbin folks (lessn tiz dun on a verr large scale, witch enron showd us all how that wurks) -- but the gummint aint gut no bizness trine to enforce the viewpoints of a relijus group that dont represent the majorty.

why caint that same group putt thar faith in god? caint he be trusted to do the judgin? kin it be they dont trust god to hold up his end of the bargain? aint they jes faithless bleevers? (god kin judge whuther thar faithless, but thats how it looks to this here sinner.)

aint it hard a nuff to live a christchun life without trine to force the gummint to poke out the motes in everybidy elses eyes? shouldnt them that bleeves spend thar time trine to live rite? aint that a big a nuff task fer a lifetime? (i know based on personull eggzperients that it takes everthang a bidy kin do to live rite n even then ye mite fall short.)

i sumtimes wunder whut kinda thankin wood lead sumbidy to wonta dicktate to everbidy else how they kin live. seems to me it cums down to this.

furst, ye gut to bleeve that god is more innerested in the kinda justus that results in eternull sufferin frum witch thar aint never no chants of eggscape fer innybidy that fails to bleeve eggzackly the rite tale bout how to git saved. (that bleef is a stumblin block fer me on a counta i caint bleeve in such a cruel god n tend to thank he wood half to be more mercifull than that.)

but ifn ye kin bleeve that, ifn ye bleeve in eternull torment fer them that bleeves the rong thang, then secunt, why woodnt ye wont folks to be punished fer the rest of thar lives ifn they do innythang that the faithless bleevers thanks is rong, such as gittin pregnunt ere yer marrd? ifn ye do such a evil thang, ye deeserve yer punishment, witch that means havin the child, period, n probly bein forced into a marrg when yer barely outta hi skool.

n thurd, bad luck should be punishd: must be gods will or sumthin.

corse, bad luck dont mean the woman wood half to git marrd: ifn a woman should have the terrbull luck of gittin raped, speshly ifn twuz her father or her bruther or her uncle or sum criminull rapist she dont never see agin in life, least she wont half to marr the bum.

but ifn them faithless bleevers gits thar way, she also wont have the opshun of gittin rid of the lil zygote n takin a risk that wood only apply to her, gods judgment.

in sted, she will be judged -- n punished -- by the gummint them faithless bleevers wonts to force on the rest of us.

ifn ye have faith, ye know that god knows how to handle the situwayshun, both fer the judgers n the judged. n ifn ye bleeve life cummences with concepshun (n not with the 'breath of life' frum genesis), then ye orta try to cunvints everbidy that tiz evil n rong to abort. tiz yer rite to do that. but ye dont have to take away the rites that the majorty of murkins bleeves women orta have.

ifn ye truly bleeve, why not have the faith to let god do the judgin? could it be ye fear gods mercy? on a counta thays a lot of it in that thar new testamint, witch thats whar tiz claimed that tiz god, not humans, that duz the judgin of everbidy.

but most of all, how cum bleevers caint have faith in whut they claim to bleeve?

(ifn ye wonta make a comment, ye gut to click on 'link' below.)

1 comment:

fletch said...

I've always thought if the pro-life folk were truly pro-life, they could put an end to abortion virtually overnight. Not with the Supreme Court or passing laws, but by offering true care and support for those who need it, and I don't mean just giving a few dollars to the local mega-church. The churches alone have enough wealth to care and provide for those in true need without government assistance, yet they predominantly vote for politicians who cut government programs to aid the needy while expecting "big" government to enforce their world view which doesn't include true and prolonged acts of compassion.
There's nothing at all stopping pro-lifers from greatly reducing abortions now to an insignificant number, by providing counseling, and if need be care for the infant to maturity. The number of abortions aren't a failure of an immoral society at large or liberal judges, but a failure of an immoral church not acting on the basic, fundamental teachings of Jesus. Sorry for the rant.